← All articles
OperationsJune 22, 2026·7 min read

VNEM vs. Physical Submetering: Which Solar Billing Model Fits Your Building?

Virtual net metering is simpler. Physical submetering gives you more control. Which one fits depends on state, unit count, and existing wiring.

Virtual net metering (VNEM)

The utility credits solar production to individual tenant accounts based on an allocation schedule you file. No new physical meters required. Available in ~14 states.

Pros: cheapest to deploy, works with existing utility relationships, no wiring changes. Cons: only in eligible states, less flexible pricing, allocation changes require utility paperwork.

Physical submetering

You install revenue-grade meters on each unit's circuit and bill tenants directly for solar-attributed consumption.

Pros: works in any state, full pricing control, real consumption data. Cons: requires electrical work ($400–$900/unit), triggers utility-of-record filings in some states, more complex billing.

Default recommendations

  • California, Massachusetts, New York, Illinois, Virginia: VNEM where the tariff is favorable.
  • Texas, Florida, most SE states: physical submetering — VNEM often not offered.
  • New construction / gut renos: submeter anywhere — the incremental cost is trivial during framing.

Want to see what your roof could earn? Estimate your NOI lift or talk to our team.

Next step

See what your roof could earn.

Get a free site-level estimate of solar NOI for your property. No sales call required — we send a written model.